Developing a core outcome set for future infertility research: an international consensus development study
J.M.N. Duffy 1,2,*, H. AlAhwany 3, S. Bhattacharya 4, B. Collura 5,C. Curtis 6,7, J.L.H. Evers 8, R.G. Farquharson 9, S. Franik 10, L.C. Giudice 11,12, Y. Khalaf 13, J.M.L. Knijnenburg 14, B. Leeners 15, R.S. Legro 16, S. Lensen 17, J.C. Vazquez-Niebla 18, D. Mavrelos 19, B.W.J. Mol 20, C. Niederberger 21, E.H.Y. Ng 22,23, A.S. Otter 24, L. Puscasiu 25, S. Rautakallio-Hokkanen 26, S. Repping 27, I. Sarris 1, J.L. Simpson 28, A. Strandell 29, C. Strawbridge 30, H.L. Torrance 31, A. Vail 32, M. van Wely 27, M.A. Vercoe 33, N.L. Vuong 34, A.Y. Wang 35, R. Wang 20, J. Wilkinson 32, M.A. Youssef 36, C.M. Farquhar 33, and the Core Outcome Measure for Infertility Trials (COMMIT) initiative
STUDY QUESTION: Can a core outcome set to standardize outcome selection, collection and reporting across future infertility research be developed?
SUMMARY ANSWER: A minimum data set, known as a core outcome set, has been developed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews evaluating potential treatments for infertility.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Complex issues, including a failure to consider the perspectives of people with fertility problems when selecting outcomes, variations in outcome definitions and the selective reporting of outcomes on the basis of statistical analysis, make the results of infertility research difficult to interpret.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A three-round Delphi survey (372 participants from 41 countries) and consensus development workshop (30 participants from 27 countries).
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Healthcare professionals, researchers and people with fertility problems were brought together in an open and transparent process using formal consensus science methods.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The core outcome set consists of: viable intrauterine pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound (accounting for singleton, twin and higher multiple pregnancy); pregnancy loss (accounting for ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, stillbirth and termination of pregnancy); live birth; gestational age at delivery; birthweight; neonatal mortality; and major congenital anomaly. Time to pregnancy leading to live birth should be reported when applicable.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: We used consensus development methods which have inherent limitations, including the representativeness of the participant sample, Delphi survey attrition and an arbitrary consensus threshold.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Embedding the core outcome set within RCTs and systematic reviews should ensure the comprehensive selection, collection and reporting of core outcomes. Research funding bodies, the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) statement, and over 80 specialty journals, including the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group, Fertility and Sterility and Human Reproduction, have committed to implementing this core outcome set.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This research was funded by the Catalyst Fund, Royal Society of New Zealand, Auckland Medical Research Fund and Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust. The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study, the collection, management, analysis or interpretation of data, or manuscript preparation. B.W.J.M. is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Practitioner Fellowship (GNT1082548). S.B. was supported by University of Auckland Foundation Seelye Travelling Fellowship. S.B. reports being the Editor-in-Chief of Human Reproduction Open and an editor of the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility group. J.L.H.E. reports being the Editor Emeritus of Human Reproduction. J.M.L.K. reports research sponsorship from Ferring and Theramex. R.S.L. reports consultancy fees from Abbvie, Bayer, Ferring, Fractyl, Insud Pharma and Kindex and research sponsorship from Guerbet and Hass Avocado Board. B.W.J.M. reports consultancy fees from Guerbet, iGenomix, Merck, Merck KGaA and ObsEva. C.N. reports being the Co Editor-in-Chief of Fertility and Sterility and Section Editor of the Journal of Urology, research sponsorship from Ferring, and retains a financial interest in NexHand. A.S. reports consultancy fees from Guerbet. E.H.Y.N. reports research sponsorship from Merck. N.L.V. reports consultancy and conference fees from Ferring, Merck and Merck Sharp and Dohme. The remaining authors declare no competing interests in relation to the work presented. All authors have completed the disclosure form.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative: 1023.
Consensus development study / core outcome sets / modified Delphi method / modified Nominal Group Technique / outcome measures; outcomes
Review Standardizing definitions and reporting guidelines for the infertility core outcome set: an international consensus development study
[ J. M. N. Duffy,a,b S. Bhattacharya,c S. Bhattacharya,c M. Bofill,d B. Collura,e C. Curtis,f,g J. L. H. Evers,h L. C. Giudice,i,j R. G. Farquharson,k S. Franik,l M. Hickey,m M. L. Hull,n V. Jordan,d Y. Khalaf,o R. S. Legro,p S. Lensen,m D. Mavrelos,q B. W. Mol,r C. Niederberger,s E. H. Y. Ng,t,u L. Puscasiu,v S. Repping,w,x I. Sarris,a M. Showell,y A. Strandell,z A. Vail,aa M. van Wely,w M. Vercoe,y N. L. Vuong,bb A. Y. Wang,cc R. Wang,r J. Wilkinson,aa M. A. Youssef,dd C. M. arquhard,y and the Core Outcome Measure for Infertility Trials (COMMIT) initiativez ]
Study Question: Can consensus definitions for the core outcome set for infertility be identified in o...
Review Low Prognosis by the POSEIDON Criteria in Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Multicenter and Multinational Prevalence Study of Over 13,000 Patients
[ Sandro C. Esteves1*, Hakan Yarali2,3, Lan N. Vuong4,5,6, José F. Carvalho7, İrem Y. Özbek2, Mehtap Polat2, Ho L. Le4,5, Toan D. Pham4,5, and Tuong M. Ho4,5 on behalf of The POSEIDON Group †
Objective: To estimate the prevalence of low-prognosis patients according to the POSEIDON criteria using real-world data....
Review Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in-vitro fertilisation in couples with infertility in whom the male partner has normal total sperm count and motility: an open-label, randomised controlled trial
[ Vinh Q Dang1,2, Lan N Vuong2,3, Tam M Luu1, Toan D Pham2, Tuong M Ho2,4, Anh N Ha1, Binh T Truong4, Anh K Phan1, Dung P Nguyen1, Thanh N Pham4, Quan T Pham2, Rui Wang5, Robert J Norman6, Ben W Mol7 ]
The use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection has increased substantially worldwide, primarily in couples with n...
Review Biphasic in vitro maturation (CAPA-IVM) specifically improves the developmental capacity of oocytes from small antral follicles
[ Sanchez F1,2, Le AH3,4, Ho VNA3,4, Romero S1,2, Van Ranst H1, De Vos M1, Gilchrist RB5, Ho TM3,4, Vuong LN3,4,6, Smitz J1 ]
To investigate the effectiveness of a biphasic IVM culture strategy at...
Review The effect of an immediate frozen embryo transfer following a freeze-all protocol: a retrospective analysis from two centres
[ Samuel Santos-Ribeiro1,2,*, Nikolaos P. Polyzos1,3, Vuong Thi Ngoc Lan4,5, Johannie Siffain1, Shari Mackens1, Lisbet Van Landuyt1, Herman Tournaye1, and Christophe Blockeel1,6 ]
Does the timing of the first frozen embryo transfer (FET) after gonadotropin-releasing hormone (Gn...